-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 11.06.2013 20:16, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Sorry for the dumb question, but: which version of Automake are
> you using? And: are you sure the ylwrap script are you using is
> actually in sync with that version?
Sorry for being unclear -- t
On 06/11/2013 07:57 PM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a project where I let flex generate a header file -- however
> ylwrap throws this file away. According to bugs #8844 and #9933 this
> should work now -- is that a regression, or have the bugs been closed
> before the updated code made i
>>> "Bob" == Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Hi,
Bob> Is there some sort of Email filter you guys could use to
Bob> keep spam at a minimum. It seems like the automake mailing list
Bob> recieves a lot of spam ( in comparison to other mailing lists ).
spam is filtered globally on all
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:15:07PM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> Dan> IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers.
> Dan> I thought it already did.
>
>
> I agree, however I think the current stable version of Mailman (2.0.x)
> currently only allows the list admin
Dan> IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers.
Dan> I thought it already did.
I agree, however I think the current stable version of Mailman (2.0.x)
currently only allows the list admin to hold messages, which then have to be
reviewed by a human. I don't know if
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:54:52PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers.
> I thought it already did.
Every project considering doing this needs to ask themselves whether
they are prepared to miss out on bug reports as a result. This is a fact
n' subject lines and
animations
of people f**king landing in my mailbox... anything to stop
spam is all right by me.
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: Justin Kirby
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/14/2002 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: spam
I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I
I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I was
having... (figured it out without have to post I think)...
But I would like to interject my $0.02 in this...
I am subscribed to a TON of lists, all of them require you to subscribe
in order to post. This is generally considered a
Hi!
[Sorry for offtopic, but since Christoph wants to discuss this in the
list, I don't want readers to see only his replies, but not mine]
> proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from
> proski> http://spamassassin.org/
>
> Not everybody has the possibility to
proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it
proski> from http://spamassassin.org/
christoph> Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am
christoph> not the system administrator)
I use SA. With its default settings many of the recent
proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from
proski> http://spamassassin.org/
Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am not the system
administrator)
proski> Please keep in mind that Automake developers don't have access to the
proski> mailing
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 06:41, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> > word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
>
> I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
> prevent spam and I can
> It is possible to set up moderation. Actually, moderation is a wrong
> word. The only responsibility of the moderator show be preventing spam.
I help moderate a few of the GNU lists which are moderated solely to
prevent spam and I can tell you from personal experience that it is a
pain. Mai
> There is no point in debating about spam here, it becomes spam by
> itself.
Especially if you receive every e-mail twice...
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, gett
> "Rupert" == Rupert Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rupert> Lars J. Aas wrote:
>> : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join
>> the : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to
>> post is : OK.
>>
>> I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to rem
Lars J. Aas wrote:
> : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
> : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to post is
> : OK.
>
> I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to remember there were
> some strong opinions against this the last time it w
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Mats Lidell wrote:
: > Lars wrote:
: Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
: Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
: Lars> subscribers can post
:
: Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fa
> Lars wrote:
Lars> [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that
Lars> currently gets through without closing the list so only
Lars> subscribers can post
Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the
list so that requiring that you are a member if you want
Have a look at `spamassassin', it works great. Look at the following
folder, last erased Jan 12th, which it made thanks to the following
bits of .procmailrc:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
caughtspam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Get ready to see BIGGEST teen sit
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:10:25AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
: Hello!
:
: > We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
: > it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
: > without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderat
Hello!
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
> it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
> without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderating the
> postings from non-subscribers. Nobody is interested in the mo
> We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering
Thank you for that, at least.
> BTW, it's driving me nuts too, but I'm out of filtering ideas...
Allow only messages containing the line "Dear Automake,"? Maybe not.
Regards, Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:46:26AM +, F J Franklin wrote:
: Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts!
We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but
it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through
without closing
> "Stephan" == Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe we could convince the GNU sysadmins to turn on spam blocking.
Stephan> Speaking as mail admin for @kde.org I can only tell you that
Stephan> this is impossible.
I disagree. On sources.redhat.com we run lots of spam blocking.
Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> > "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup
> Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that
> Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list.
>
> We can't mov
> "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup
Allan> grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that
Allan> requires that all posters are members of the list.
We can't move the list.
Maybe we could convinc
One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup grew
from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that requires that all
posters are members of the list.
Invites may be required.
Or... GNU could extend their mailinglists to require authentication on
their website and membership
27 matches
Mail list logo
