Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Paul" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jl> Well, at my site we have gcc-2.8.1 _and_ gcc-2.95.2, emacs-19.34 jl> _and_ emacs-20.2, etc. Paul> Yes, but if you ever try to install them you'll see they install Paul> as "emacs" and "gcc" by default. It's been a long time since I ha

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still one > more out there. There are at least five or six of them that I've heard about, and a new one seems to show up at every LISA. Sometimes two. Plus some of us have rolled our own. --

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Morten Eriksen
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [about making it possible to set PACKAGE] > We could add it, but it doesn't seem that useful in general. It'd be nice to be able to name ``libmyfancylib'' as ``libmyfancylibdbg'' depending on a --disable-debug option to configue, for instance, to make it po

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Morten Eriksen
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least > tom> one other one whose name I forgot. > > Paul> I think you're thinking of depot. > > It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still > one more out there.

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
Lasgouttes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least tom> one other one whose name I forgot. Paul> I think you're thinking of depot. It wasn't depot -- I forg

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least tom> one other one whose name I forgot. I think you're thinking of depot. -- --- Paul D. Smith <

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
tom> There are a few tools like this. GNU stow is one. There is at least tom> one other one whose name I forgot. Paul> I think you're thinking of depot. It wasn't depot -- I forgot all about that one. So there's still one more out there. Tom

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 10:45 AM To: Masterson, David Cc: 'Jean-Marc Lasgouttes'; Tom Tromey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time %% "Masterson, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: md> If you want, I have a Perl too

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Harlan Stenn
I'm starting to use "modules" to handle this problem; one installs software in, say, /opt/pkg/@PACKAGE@/@VERSION@/ and then updates a small file in, say, /opt/modules/modulfiles/@PACKAGE@/@VERSION@ (this is a file, not a directory), and then the "modules" script handles setting up the PATH, MANPAT

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% "Masterson, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: md> If you want, I have a Perl tool that I picked up and enhanced md> called PKGLINK that could help with this. Basically, with md> pkglink, you install all packages in there own prefix directory md> and then use pkglink to symbolically l

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "David" == Masterson, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> If you want, I have a Perl tool that I picked up and enhanced David> called PKGLINK that could help with this. Basically, with David> pkglink, you install all packages in there own prefix directory David> and then use pkglink t

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Paul D. Smith
%% Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently, but does this JMarc> standard way exist? Tom> Most

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
if someone knows a good place to put it, let me know. -Original Message- From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 9:20 AM To: Tom Tromey Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time >>>>> &q

RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Masterson, David
I do it by something like: configure --prefix=/packages/lyx/lyx- make make install -Original Message- From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 9:01 AM To: Tom Tromey Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> If you look you'll find that gcc and emacs are basically the only Tom> GNU tools that do this. This feature isn't specified by the GNU Tom> standards, and wasn't in wide use as I wrote automake. So there Tom> didn't seem to be much reason

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> Well, at my site we have gcc-2.8.1 _and_ gcc-2.95.2, JMarc> emacs-19.34 _and_ emacs-20.2, etc. I thought this was a kind of JMarc> feature of some GNU tools. Is this way of fdoing things JMarc> deprecated? A different --pref

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently, but does this JMarc> standard way exist? Tom> Most people just make a new --prefix. Well, at my site we have gcc-2

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
JMarc> Thanks for the tip. Does it mean that what I am trying to do is JMarc> not a good idea, or that automake is lacking a feature? I'm not sure it is either of these. JMarc> What I mean is that I am ready to provide a more "standard" way JMarc> of installing several LyX versions concurrently,

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> With autoconf, since I want to use the autogenerated makefile JMarc> rules, I figured out that setting PACKAGE to the right value at JMarc> configure time should work. Un

Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time

2000-05-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> With autoconf, since I want to use the autogenerated makefile JMarc> rules, I figured out that setting PACKAGE to the right value at JMarc> configure time should work. Unfortunately, I cannot get the JMarc> name of the insta