>> However, I wouldn't want Automake to move the comments. Automake
>> isn't, and doesn't try to be, a make-rule validator for the
>> user-written rules in Makefile.am. It should not move things around
>> inside the rules nor should it remove or add lines to those rules.
>
>Yes. Equally however
- Original Message -
From: "Raja R Harinath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Dean Povey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subjec
Hi,
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dean Povey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Bugs/Features in handling of continued Makefile rules
>> ??? wrote:
>> >Use
>> >## Comment
>
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Povey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bugs/Features in handling of continued Makefile rules
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>
> >>
> >
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>
>> 3. Because of a stupidity in Tru64 make, automake displays
>>an error message if comments are found immediately after
>> the tab (plus
>>zero/more whitespace). I think perhaps a nicer approach
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> 3. Because of a stupidity in Tru64 make, automake displays
>an error message if comments are found immediately after
> the tab (plus
>zero/more whitespace). I think perhaps a nicer approach
> would
