>>> "sbd" == Drummonds, Scott B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
sbd> Also, what exactly is the difference between --acdir and -I?
Please see section `Macro search path' of the manual.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm not sure, but I think another possibility might be that the
> right aclocal program is still finding the old 1.4 macros.
Hmmm... I think you're on to something. The previous build owner added
some additional macros to the default source of aclocal macros. He put
t
"Drummonds, Scott B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I guess my original post wasn't complete. I had successfully
> rerun aclocal before generating this error message. This version of
> aclocal, from the same Automake installation directory, reports itself
> as "aclocal (GNU Automake) 1.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:09:34AM -0800, Drummonds, Scott B wrote:
> I had successfully
> rerun aclocal [1.7] before generating this error message.
>
> So, I do believe that this error is occuring because of configure.in.
I'm not sure, but I think another possibility might be that the
right aclo
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It's not complaining about your configure.in, but rather that the
> old Automake-1.4 macros are still in your aclocal.m4 file. With
> luck, rerunning (the 1.7 version of) the "aclocal" program should
> fix that.
Actually, I guess my original post wasn't complete. I had
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:50:54AM -0800, Drummonds, Scott B wrote:
>
> configure.in:10: your implementation of AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE comes from an
> configure.in:10: old Automake version. You should recreate aclocal.m4
> configure.in:10: with aclocal and run automake again.
>
>
> This surprises me,
