> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Esben> Did you notice the LEX hack ? Am I right about automake
Esben> currently lacking support for multiple lexers in one binary?
Esben> (although the docs clearly states that it is supported)
Lars> I haven't tried the lex support in Auto
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:06:17PM +0200, Esben Haabendal Soerensen wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > The below Makefile.am gets rid of the warnings.
:
: Ah, that makes sense (while the warning message did not so much).
: Works nicely also, thanks!
You're welcome.
: Did you
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Automake doesn't know about mutually exclusive conditionals (they are
> controlled from the configure script, so anything can happen), so you
> should rewrite the Makefile.am to something Automake will be more
> comfortable with - knowing that a variabl
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:40:26PM +0200, Esben Haabendal Soerensen wrote:
: I attach the configure.in and src/Makefile.am here.
Automake doesn't know about mutually exclusive conditionals (they are
controlled from the configure script, so anything can happen), so you
should rewrite the Makefile.
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then there's probably something weird with your setup of the conditionals.
> I'll have to see configure.in and the offending Makefile.am to be able to
> assist any further.
No problem. The problem is with the PC/SC Lite package from the
M.U.S.C.L.E. p
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:16:35PM +0200, Esben Haabendal Soerensen wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > I'm not able to reproduce this behaviour, but I'm using CVS
: > Automake. Which version are you using?
:
: I get the behaviour both with automake 1.4 and CVS version (from t
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not able to reproduce this behaviour, but I'm using CVS
> Automake. Which version are you using?
I get the behaviour both with automake 1.4 and CVS version (from today).
> Anyways, Automake has been known to not be happy about user
> variables co
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:31:56AM +0200, Esben Haabendal Soerensen wrote:
: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: > Use an AM_CONDITIONAL instead.
:
: Thanks, I now have everything working by using AM_CONDITIONAL. I even
: got some more understanding of how everything works at the same
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Use an AM_CONDITIONAL instead.
Thanks, I now have everything working by using AM_CONDITIONAL. I even
got some more understanding of how everything works at the same time
:)
Everything works, but... I get a lot (102) warnings like these when I run
s
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:07:23PM +0200, Esben Haabendal Soerensen wrote:
: In Makefile.am:
:
: lib_LTLIBRARIES = foobar.la
: foobar_la_SOURCES = foo.c @BAR_SOURCE@
: EXTRA_foobar_la_SOURCES = bar_linux.c bar_freebsd.c
Use an AM_CONDITIONAL instead.
if USE_LINUXSOURCES
BARSOURCE = bar_linux.c
Hi
I am trying port a project's build system to automake, and this
project has a library which links objects from different source files
depending on the platform. Let's say we have two platforms, linux and
freebsd.
In Makefile.am:
lib_LTLIBRARIES = foobar.la
foobar_la_SOURCES = foo.c @BAR_SO
11 matches
Mail list logo
