Re: Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-22 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
[Sorry for the delay. I have been switching providers.] >>> "Chris" == Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Libtool libraries are not programs. If that used to work in 1.8 it >> was a bug. Chris> it certainly worked in 1.6 to 1.8 (and maybe earlier but I can't Chris> remember that far

Re: Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-13 Thread Chris Ison
Libtool libraries are not programs. If that used to work in 1.8 it was a bug. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz it certainly worked in 1.6 to 1.8 (and maybe earlier but I can't remember that far back), but not 1.9 ... if this has changed in 1.9 what is the right way to do it (using the Makefile.am in e

Re: Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-13 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Chris! >>> "Chris" == Chris Ison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> plugin_PROGRAMS= @CD_PLUGIN_TARGETS@ Chris> noinst_PROGRAMS= @CD_PLUGIN_STATIC@ Chris> EXTRA_PROGRAMS= cd_file.la cd_linux.la cd_sdl.la cd_sgi.la cd_win.la cd_xmms.la Libtool libraries are not programs. If that used to wo

Possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-12 Thread Chris Ison
I am having a problem getting a project to compile under automake 1.9.2 (and 1.9.1) where it works fine under 1.8 before I send a bug report off, I am wanting to know if anyone else has seen the problem. make is reporting make[3]: *** No rule to make target `cd_sdl_la-cd_sdl.lo', needed by `cd

possable automake 1.9 bug

2004-10-12 Thread Chris Ison
I am having a problem getting a project to compile under automake 1.9.2 (and 1.9.1) where it works fine under 1.8 before I send a bug report off, I am wanting to know if anyone else has seen the problem. make is reporting make[3]: *** No rule to make target `cd_sdl_la-cd_sdl.lo', needed by `cd