On 11/11/2014 10:59 AM, fr33domlover wrote:
>>> The first form of expansion on that page, $(var:.a=.b), should be OK.
>>> They are standard in POSIX and work on all make implementations that I
>>> know of.
>>>
>>> The version with % characters is not portable.
>>
>> That said, POSIX is hoping to s
On 2014-10-27
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 11:11 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> >> I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use
> >> makefile variables, so just to be sure -
> >>
> >> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual
On 10/27/2014 11:11 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use makefile
>> variables, so just to be sure -
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Substitution-Refs.html
>>
>> Are th
On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use makefile
> variables, so just to be sure -
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Substitution-Refs.html
>
> Are these uses of variables portable, or should a porta
Hello,
I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use makefile
variables, so just to be sure -
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Substitution-Refs.html
Are these uses of variables portable, or should a portable Makefile.am use only
the plain $(var) form wit
