> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need
Akim> nor want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
adl> I can't see how this option would be the problem.
adl>
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:02, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
Robert> Still I don't see how that could be accomplished with Bruce's
Robert> suggestio
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:02, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Robert> Still I don't see how that could be accomplished with Bruce's
> Robert> suggestion of multiple targets.
>
> IMHO ./configure is not a exactly the right i
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Robert> Still I don't see how that could be accomplished with Bruce's
Robert> suggestion of multiple targets.
IMHO ./configure is not a exactly the right interface to make
distribution policy decisions.
IIRC in the past Tom sug
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
Akim> want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
I can't see how this option would be the problem.
(BTW, have you considered `dist dist-all: dist-bzip2'?)
--
Alexandre
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 18:11, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Robert> This means:
> Robert> build dist tree
> Robert> compress with compressor 1
> Robert> compress with compressor 2
> Robert> clean dist tree
>
> This is
>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Robert> This means:
Robert> build dist tree
Robert> compress with compressor 1
Robert> compress with compressor 2
Robert> clean dist tree
This is the current behavior of `make dist'.
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Bruce Korb wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 02:25, Bruce Korb wrote:
>>
>>>Akim Demaille wrote:
>>>
Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
>>>
>>>If you are going to parameterize it at all, then parame
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 13:14, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 02:25, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > > Akim Demaille wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
> > > > want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
> > >
> > > If yo
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 02:25, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > Akim Demaille wrote:
> > >
> > > Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
> > > want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
> >
> > If you are going to parameterize it at all, then parameterize it
> > c
On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 02:25, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> >
> > Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
> > want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
>
> If you are going to parameterize it at all, then parameterize it
> completely. e.g. --compressor=bzip2 [
Am Freitag, 26. Juli 2002 18:25 schrieb Bruce Korb:
> Akim Demaille wrote:
> > Would that be accepted? For some of my projects, I don't need nor
> > want the .gz, I just want the .bz2.
>
Yes, that is a good idea.
> If you are going to parameterize it at all, then parameterize it
> completely.
12 matches
Mail list logo