Re: Mostly similar library generation

2002-04-15 Thread Harlan Stenn
Bruce, Thanks for the response, and sorry about my spam filter at UDel - I haven't figured out a way to auto-whitelist responses to my outgoing list email (or even plain outgoing email - I'm not that much of a procmail hacker yet). So LDADD as opposed to LIBADD? And I gather I should say: libf

Re: Mostly similar library generation

2002-04-15 Thread Bruce Korb
Harlan Stenn wrote: > I now have to build two libraries, libfoo.a and libfoosim.a, where the > only difference between the two libraries is that bar.c is compiled > "normally" for libfoo.a, but for libfoosim.a I need to also supply > -DSIM when compiling bar.c . > > As you might imagine, I'm doi

Mostly similar library generation

2002-04-14 Thread Harlan Stenn
First, I think the ctags/etags example in the docs are wrong, at least in the more complex example that describes de-ANSI-fication. In both the examples the input should be coming from a ._c file and the resulting file should be a ._o file. Perhaps better, a combined example that uses $U? And t