Hi Dave, Stefano,
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dave Goodell wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:19 PM CST, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> On 11/08/2012 07:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> I'd expect its definition to be brought in by the 'libtoolize' call
>> issued by autoreconf; but then I see, in the o
On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:19 PM CST, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 07:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>>
>>> autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
[…]
>>> lib/Makefile.am:31: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined
>>> lib/Make
ac:11: installing './config.sub'
>> configure.ac:23: installing './install-sh'
>> configure.ac:23: installing './missing'
>> doc/Makefile.am:42: installing 'doc/texinfo.tex'
>> lib/Makefile.am:31: error: Libtool library used but &#x
nfigure.ac:23: installing './missing'
> doc/Makefile.am:42: installing 'doc/texinfo.tex'
> lib/Makefile.am:31: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined
> lib/Makefile.am:31: The usual way to define 'LIBTOOL' is to add 'LT_INIT&#
On Monday 06 December 2004 01:18 pm, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > Subject: 29,
> > 900 English pages for "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"
>
> google is exaggerating, of co
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:57:50PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Subject: 29,
> 900 English pages for "Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"
google is exaggerating, of course.
When you enter
"Libtool library used but LIBTOOL is undefined"
wit
Maybe someone can figure out a better error message, please?
For those that found *this* message because of the subject line:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2004-07/msg00083.html
> Stephan> although AC_PROG_LIBTOOL _is_ present in configure.ac.
>
> Therefore it means AC_PROG_L
