Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 04:00:42PM CEST:
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>
>> Well, the user should be able to override the `check' target if he so
>> wants. If it's possible to reliably warn without giving false failures
>> without a l
On Oct 21, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 01:58:23PM CEST:
Hello list,
Due to a sudden lack of imagination, I wrote a testsuite named
`check' and
used it as a `check_SCRIPTS' which led to an infinite recursion of
make
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit SIGOURE wrote on Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 01:58:23PM CEST:
> Hello list,
> Due to a sudden lack of imagination, I wrote a testsuite named `check' and
> used it as a `check_SCRIPTS' which led to an infinite recursion of make
> (because the .PHONY check depends on check-am which
Hello list,
Due to a sudden lack of imagination, I wrote a testsuite named
`check' and used it as a `check_SCRIPTS' which led to an infinite
recursion of make (because the .PHONY check depends on check-am which
does a `$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $(check_SCRIPTS)' so the make has no
chance of
