Re: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-05-06 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Would it be OK to say: Harlan> INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=$${INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG:-s} \ Harlan> in lib/am/install.am? Tom> I wouldn't have a problem with this. Alexandre? I don't

Re: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-05-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Harlan> Would it be OK to say: Harlan> INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=$${INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG:-s} \ Harlan> in lib/am/install.am? I wouldn't have a problem with this. Alexandre? We'd need to document INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG. Harlan> - if I "quoted"

Re: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-04-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
Would it be OK to say: INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=$${INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG:-s} \ in lib/am/install.am? I'm not sure about 3 things: - if I "quoted" that right - if ${foo:-value} is sufficiently portable - if it's Bad to leave INSTALL_STRIP_FLAGS set in general In this last case, it might be a choi

INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG is apparently hardwired.

2002-04-25 Thread Harlan Stenn
install.am hardwires the INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG to -s. I think this is a lose - there are cases (like installing kernel modules for an embedded system) where one wants to do a stripped install but -s is "too much". In the existing code there is apparently no way to override this. What's a good solu