Hi Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:53:11AM CET:
> nobase_ is really a nice feature to cope with a structured hierarchy of
> files. But it does not work well with packages that avoid recursive
> Makefiles.
It is normally not a good thing to avoid recursive makefiles at al
Le 19 mars 09 à 14:53, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
Akim Demaille wrote:
Hi autofriends!
nobase_ is really a nice feature to cope with a structured
hierarchy of files. But it does not work well with packages that
avoid recursive Makefiles. In my case for instance, my package has
a hierarch
Akim Demaille wrote:
Hi autofriends!
nobase_ is really a nice feature to cope with a structured hierarchy of
files. But it does not work well with packages that avoid recursive
Makefiles. In my case for instance, my package has a hierarchy of files
in $(top_srcdir)/include, but it has no in
Hi autofriends!
nobase_ is really a nice feature to cope with a structured hierarchy
of files. But it does not work well with packages that avoid
recursive Makefiles. In my case for instance, my package has a
hierarchy of files in $(top_srcdir)/include, but it has no include/
Makefile.am
