Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:11:36PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >Then, a comment to the Makefile.am: you don't need the lines > >| srcdir = @srcdir@ > >| VPATH = @VPATH@ > >| @SET_MAKE@ > >| SUBDIRS = > > > >automake will take care of that by itself. > > Is also > >

Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-10 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Ah, ok. A couple of comments. First, a bug I introduced by giving a non-complete example: Some `make' implementations will not allow you to override a macro on the command line iff it is also set in the Makefile. With `TESTS', that is the case in your script. Portable wo

Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:12:06PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:13:16PM CEST: > > > >>Instead, what I would like to have is to only say > >>and then achieve the effect of (sorry for the pseudo-code) > >> > >> for flags

Re: [PPL-devel] Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2006-01-07 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello there, * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:13:16PM CEST: Instead, what I would like to have is to only say test1_SOURCES = test1.cc test2_SOURCES = test2.cc ... and then achieve the effect of (sorry for the pseudo-code) for flags in $FLAGS_CHOIC

Re: Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2005-10-24 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello there, * Roberto Bagnara wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:13:16PM CEST: > > Instead, what I would like to have is to only say > > test1_SOURCES = test1.cc > test2_SOURCES = test2.cc > ... > > and then achieve the effect of (sorry for the pseudo-code) > >for flags in $FLAGS_CHOICES >

Doing something just a bit more complex than `make check'

2005-10-19 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Hi there, I am using the `make check' facility offered by Automake. However, I need to realize something just a bit more complex than this. What I need to have is a way to specify that the ordinary behavior of `make check' should be repeated a number of times, each time with a different choice