On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:25:54AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> ~AM_LDFLAGS = everything gets these
> ~noinst_LTLIBRARIES_LDFLAGS = these are for convenience libs
> ~lib_LTLIBRARIES_LDFLAGS = these are for other libtool libs
> ~libm4_la_LDFLAGS = but I can override non module lib
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > I would be happy if I could do this:
> I tend to disagree with you on this point. I will agree if the system
> has three levels plus a way to provide overrides..
>
> Automake should support
>
> o inheritance of sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
| Automake should support
|
| o inheritance of standard configure flags
LDFLAGS
| o flags common across all targets
AM_LDFLAGS
| o additional flags common to a grouping of targets
dir_PRIMARY_LDFLAGS
| o additional fl
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Actually, now that you point it out, I would hit that problem myself, since m4
> has normal _LTLIBRARIES, noinst_LTLIBRARIES and modules. I would be happy if
> I could do this:
>
> ~AM_LDFLAGS = everything gets these
> ~noinst_LTLIBRARIES_LDFL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
| On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:49:04AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
|
|>It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
|>`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
|
|
| Regarding M4: las
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:49:04AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>
> It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
> `foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
Regarding M4: last time I checked you had a directory dedicated to
modules. Why don't you simply
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:24:11 -0600 (CST), "Bob Friesenhahn"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
> LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
> building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
> per-target _LDFL
It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
per-target _LDFLAGS options. Perhaps there should be both 'LT' and
non-'LT' macro versions.
Certainly this c
