On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:25:07AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:49:00AM CEST:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > >
> > > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre
> > > processed) As
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 09:55 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:52:42AM CEST:
> > OK, I just was about to try automake-CVS + autoconf-2.60 and now am
> > facing an issue with a package using subdir-objects and *_SOURCES
> > containing *.S + *.c:
> >
>
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:52:42AM CEST:
> OK, I just was about to try automake-CVS + autoconf-2.60 and now am
> facing an issue with a package using subdir-objects and *_SOURCES
> containing *.S + *.c:
>
> # autoreconf -Wall
[...]
> /opt/gnu/share/automake-1.9c/am/depend2.a
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:36 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Ralf,
>
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:28:45AM CEST:
> >
> > I know it's not implemented in automake-1.8/1.9, but I thought
> > this was fixed in HEAD;)
>
> You were right though, sorry about that. Dependency
Hello Ralf,
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:28:45AM CEST:
>
> I know it's not implemented in automake-1.8/1.9, but I thought
> this was fixed in HEAD;)
You were right though, sorry about that. Dependency tracking is
implemented in 1.9b. There is however an open issue wrt.
sub
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:49:00AM CEST:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > >
> > > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre
> > > processed) Assembler
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:49:00AM CEST:
> On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >
> > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre
> > processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of
> > discussions about
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre
> processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of
> discussions about this in various places, but no final conclusion so far.
Check aut
Hello!
What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre
processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of
discussions about this in various places, but no final conclusion so far.
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
