Lars> On a personal note, I want to add that the release cycle for
Lars> both autoconf and automake is entirely too long.
You're right.
Lars> Why was it not possible to release bugfix versions of both
Lars> tools before putting in all this new stuff (>5000 lines added
Lars> in autoconf Chan
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Jun 22, 2000, Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is highly confusing, and should be rephrased
>
> It doesn't make much sense to rephrase it now that we have a
> completely different dependency tracking mechanism :-)
A different mechanism maybe, but
On Jun 22, 2000, Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is highly confusing, and should be rephrased
It doesn't make much sense to rephrase it now that we have a
completely different dependency tracking mechanism :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~o
The automake 1.4 manual, and also the cvs version, says under
OMIT_DEPENDENCIES:
| When added to the @file{Makefile.in}, the dependencies have all
| system-specific dependencies automatically removed. This can be done by
| listing the files in @samp{OMIT_DEPENDENCIES}. For instance all
| ref
