On 11/2/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello NightStrike, whoever you are,
>
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:29:01PM CET:
> > Currently, the macro AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will search for dlltool and
> > define $(DLLTOOL) appropriately. If I only want dlltool itself and
>
On 11/2/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:43:05PM CET:
> > On 11/2/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > AC_CHECK_TOOL(DLLTOOL, dlltool, false)
> >
> > How does that handle cross configurations? For instance, if the t
* NightStrike wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:43:05PM CET:
> On 11/2/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AC_CHECK_TOOL(DLLTOOL, dlltool, false)
>
> How does that handle cross configurations? For instance, if the tool
> is x86_64-pc-mingw32-dlltool?
$ info --index-search=AC_CH
On 11/2/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello NightStrike, whoever you are,
Hi :)
> * NightStrike wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:29:01PM CET:
> > Currently, the macro AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will search for dlltool and
> > define $(DLLTOOL) appropriately. If I only want dlltool itself
Hello NightStrike, whoever you are,
* NightStrike wrote on Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 05:29:01PM CET:
> Currently, the macro AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will search for dlltool and
> define $(DLLTOOL) appropriately. If I only want dlltool itself and
> not the rest of the libtool package, is there some sort of
> AC
Currently, the macro AC_PROG_LIBTOOL will search for dlltool and
define $(DLLTOOL) appropriately. If I only want dlltool itself and
not the rest of the libtool package, is there some sort of
AC_PROG_DLLTOOL macro available? The issue is that I need ranlib, and
using both AC_PROG_RANLIB And AC_PRO
