> (Answering only for Automake, because I've also been confused by
> Akim's last statements about announcements that shouldn't be
> considered official.)
Sorry about this. I was trying to make a difference bw pre-released
on my web site, and really released on GNU site. Maybe that was wrong
> Anyway, back to Dalibor's question:
> 2.57 is the last version announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2.58 is the last version available on ftp.gnu.org
> 2.59 is the last version (pre-)announced to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Which one is to be considered the last official release? I
> understa
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Akim> Unfortunately it relied on this obscurity: it is
Akim> important, if you want some real feedback, that many
Akim> people use it as a real release. So if I flag it as a
Akim> pre-release, I doubt it will be tested as thorough
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
(Answering only for Automake, because I've also been confused by
Akim's last statements about announcements that shouldn't be
considered official.)
"Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Dalibor> Can I build automake 1.7.9 (if that's officially
(Answering only for Automake, because I've also been confused by
Akim's last statements about announcements that shouldn't be
considered official.)
>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Dalibor> Can I build automake 1.7.9 (if that's officially the
Dalibor> latest)
I
Hi all,
the recent confusion about what's been released and what hasn't has left
me confused. What are the latest, officially released versions of
automake and autoconf? Can I build automake 1.7.9 (if that's officially
the latest) with autconf 2.57, 2.58 or 2.59 or whatever the latest
official
