> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> i understood my question was stupid: the order does not matter,
Akim> because if it's a rule, then it amkes no sense (hence is
Akim> forbidden) to have two equivalent conditions (actually one being
Akim> provalbe by the other is enough) or i
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> The question can be asked as ``how should be output conditionals
Akim> in Makfiles: the order does not matter, hence alphabetical is
Akim> fine, or order matters''.
If you mean the output of the `@FOO_TRUE@' leaders on a given line,
then th
> If the order does not matter, then sorting it can simplify a lot from
> the code: simplify sort the conditions, that makes a uniq means to
> designates them (conditional_same makes no sense, use eq, etc.).
> The backdraw is that the user cannot see in the Makefile something
> which is related to
There is a choice to make wrt conditionals, and I'd like to have your opinion as both
choices can be defended with sensible arguments.
The question can be asked as ``how should be output conditionals in
Makfiles: the order does not matter, hence alphabetical is fine,
or order matters''.
If the
