>>> "sbd" == Drummonds, Scott B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That shouldn't matter: $(xxx) are not evaluated when they appear
>> on the rhs of a `=', they are recursively expansed later when
>> used in a rule.
sbd> Are you sure this is right?
Yes, but only in normal conditions, when all va
>>> "sbd" == Drummonds, Scott B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sbd> From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sorry to insist, but you still haven't answered the most basic
>> question: what automake version are you using?
sbd> Begging your pardon, but this is a quote from my repl
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Drummonds, Scott B wrote:
> From: Frederik Fouvry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You can install it on other places than /usr/share or /usr/local
> > (forgot which one is the default) with
>
> But I don't own the large software project that I'm trying to modify.
> If I upgrade t
From: Frederik Fouvry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You can install it on other places than /usr/share or /usr/local
> (forgot which one is the default) with
But I don't own the large software project that I'm trying to modify.
If I upgrade the version of Automake to provide a feature I need in the
,-- On Thu, 5 Feb, Scott B. Drummonds wrote:
|
[...]
| > From the above indented output I believe you are running a
| > relic. Probably automake 1.4 or older. The last version is 1.8.2,
| > and what you do should work with 1.6 or later.
|
| You are correct that I am running an old version.
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sorry to insist, but you still haven't answered the most basic
> question: what automake version are you using?
Begging your pardon, but this is a quote from my reply to your message
that was sent both to the group and to you directly:
> I'm
>>> "sbd" == Drummonds, Scott B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
sbd> But, the Makefile that is generated from that Makefile.am has the above
sbd> statements in the following order:
sbd>
sbd> noinst_LIBRARIES = libNormal.a
sbd> ...
sbd> libNormal_a_SOURCES = source.cpp
sbd> ...
sbd> LI
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What are the symptoms? (i.e., what "doesn't work" means?)
To follow up with even more detail about this, Makefile.am looks like
this:
noinst_LIBRARIES = libNormal.a
if FEATURE
noinst_LIBRARIES += libNormalFeature.a
endif
libNormal_a_SO
Be aware that += does not work with automake conditionals in several/many
cases until you get to at least 1.6.
H
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Which version of Automake are you using? What make implementation?
I'm always afraid to answer this question, because our distributed
development environment is old and impossible (for me) to update. But,
here goes:
1194> /usr/bin/automa
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One possibility:
>
> noinst_LIBRARIES = libfoo.a
> libfoo_a_SOURCES = foo.c bar.c
>
> if FEATURE
> noinst_LIBRARIES += libMyLib.a
> libMyLIB_a_CPPFLAGS = -DMyLibExtraFlags
> libMyLib_a_SOURCES = $(libfoo_a_SOURCES)
> endif
This seems to suffer from the same problem as
>>> "sbd" == Drummonds, Scott B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sbd> Hi, everyone,
Hi,
Which version of Automake are you using? What make implementation?
[...]
sbd> the following doesn't work:
sbd> if FEATURE
sbd> EXTRA_LIBS=libMyLib.a
sbd> endif
sbd> noinst_LIBRARIES = ... $(EXTRA_LIBS)
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:41, Drummonds, Scott B wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
> How do I have an additional library built based on a Automake
> conditional?
One possibility:
noinst_LIBRARIES = libfoo.a
libfoo_a_SOURCES = foo.c bar.c
if FEATURE
noinst_LIBRARIES += libMyLib.a
libMyLIB_a_CPPFLAGS = -DMyL
Hi, everyone,
I've been playing around with the conditionals as defined in the
documentation but have been unable to achieve one of my build
environment goals. I'm hoping someone can help me with this: I want to
be able to build an additional library (using the same source as an
existing library
14 matches
Mail list logo
