Re: CXXLINK in generated Makefiles

2004-12-06 Thread Dale E. Martin
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:55:23AM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > Dale> AC_SUBST(CXX) > > This is superfluous if you already call AC_PROG_CXX. OK, I've wondered about that. > Dale> AC_SUBST(CXXLINK) > > This will override the Automake definition of this variable with > the configure de

Re: CXXLINK in generated Makefiles

2004-12-04 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Dale" == Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Dale> In my configure.ac I have: Dale> AC_SUBST(CXX) This is superfluous if you already call AC_PROG_CXX. Dale> AC_SUBST(CXXLINK) This will override the Automake definition of this variable with the configure definition of it (wh

CXXLINK in generated Makefiles

2004-12-03 Thread Dale E. Martin
Hello. For one of the projects I'm working on, we build an executable (called "scram") that emits C++ and a Makefile to compile that C++. (The build for scram itself uses autotools and has for some time now.) To deal with platform issues, we generate a Makefile stub (called Makefile.common) at s