Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-12-23 Thread Kevin Ryde
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kevin> I find though that I got it wrong for the case where automake > Kevin> isn't automatically generating any suffixes, but rather there's > Kevin> only user-supplied ones with $(SUFFIXES).

Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-12-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> I find though that I got it wrong for the case where automake Kevin> isn't automatically generating any suffixes, but rather there's Kevin> only user-supplied ones with $(SUFFIXES). This comes up in Kevin> autoconf I think. Thanks.

Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-12-21 Thread Kevin Ryde
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks, I finally checked this in. Excellent. I find though that I got it wrong for the case where automake isn't automatically generating any suffixes, but rather there's only user-supplied ones with $(SUFFIXES). This comes up in autoconf I think. Th

Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-12-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> I'd like to propose the patch below to put any $(SUFFIXES) from Kevin> Makefile.am at the head of the .SUFFIXES list in Makefile.in. Thanks, I finally checked this in. Tom

Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

2000-11-04 Thread Kevin Ryde
I'd like to propose the patch below to put any $(SUFFIXES) from Makefile.am at the head of the .SUFFIXES list in Makefile.in. This would help a certain situation in GMP where either a foo.c or foo.s is used, according to the configured target. With the whole .SUFFIXES list sorted, .c is before .