Re: Automake 1.6 info files

2002-06-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > Well is automake 1.7 special in some way? No. (At least CVS Automake insn't.) > Or will it have versioned binaries as well? It will, of course. -- Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Re: Automake 1.6 info files

2002-06-14 Thread Eric Dorland
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>> "Eric" == Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Eric> I've packaged automake-1.6, and the versioned binaries and > Eric> directories were a big help. But I'm a bit confused why the info files > Eric> are not versioned as

Re: Automake 1.6 info files

2002-06-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Eric" == Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Eric> I've packaged automake-1.6, and the versioned binaries and Eric> directories were a big help. But I'm a bit confused why the info files Eric> are not versioned as well. Was this intentional, or were they Eric> forgotten about

Automake 1.6 info files

2002-06-11 Thread Eric Dorland
Hello everyone, I'm taking over the automake packages for debian after a long period of neglect. I've packaged automake-1.6, and the versioned binaries and directories were a big help. But I'm a bit confused why the info files are not versioned as well. Was this intentional, or were they forgotte