Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-04-03 Thread Akim Demaille
> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with >> AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT. adl> Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safely adl> ignore. adl> (Akim: any idea why CVS Autoconf does not print thi

Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Jens Krüger
Hi Alexandre, with this changes all test work correctly Thanks Jens Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2002 13:31 schrieb Alexandre Duret-Lutz: > > configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with > > AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT. > > Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safe

Re: Automake 1.6 Release

2002-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Lars" == Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> New in 1.6: >> * Autoconf 2.52 is required. Lars> That's bad. I have no intention yet to switch my projects to 2.5x. This is what made this release "1.6" instead of "1.5.1". Tom

Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Nishio Futoshi
Thaks for your patch, and I got below! === All 360 tests behaved as expected (4 expected failures) === I'm now using Automake-1.6. -- Nishio Futoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
> configure.in:8: error: `Makefile' is already registered with > AC_CONFIG_FILES or AC_OUTPUT. Thanks! This is a bug in the testsuite that you can safely ignore. (Akim: any idea why CVS Autoconf does not print this error anymore?) I'm checking in the following fix. Index: ChangeLog

Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Jens Krüger
Hi Alexandre, the output of uname -a is: Linux sisyphos 2.4.10 #1 Thu Oct 4 11:01:39 CEST 2001 i686 unknown I'm using bash as shell: bash --version gives: GNU bash, version 2.05.0(1)-release (i386-suse-linux) Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. additionally I use autoconf and libtool

Re: Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Nishio Futoshi
I got same FAIL messages for pr300-*.test. OS: Linux 2.4.4 SHELL: GNU bash, version 2.04.26(1)-release (i586-redhat-linux-gnu) PERL: This is perl, v5.6.0 built for i586-linux autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52 Do you need any other infomations? Thanks --- $ make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test

Fail: pr300 (Was: Re: Automake 1.6 Release)

2002-03-07 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Jens, >>> "Jens" == Jens Krüger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jens> After configuring, make and make check I got three errors: Jens> FAIL: pr300-lib.test Jens> FAIL: pr300-ltlib.test Jens> FAIL: pr300-prog.test Could you send us the ouput of make check VERBOSE=x TESTS='pr300-lib.test p

Re: Automake 1.6 Release

2002-03-06 Thread Jens Krüger
After configuring, make and make check I got three errors: FAIL: pr300-lib.test FAIL: pr300-ltlib.test FAIL: pr300-prog.test Regards Jens Am Mittwoch, 6. März 2002 08:04 schrieb Tom Tromey: > We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.6. This release > contains many bug fixes and imp

Re: Automake 1.6 Release

2002-03-06 Thread Lars Hecking
> New in 1.6: > * Autoconf 2.52 is required. That's bad. I have no intention yet to switch my projects to 2.5x.

Automake 1.6 Release

2002-03-05 Thread Tom Tromey
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.6. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. The NEWS entry is appended. You can find the new release here: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.6.tar.gz ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/automake/automake-1.6.tar.