Re: whitespaces truncated [Automake 1.10b test release]

2009-04-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jan, * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:21:08AM CEST: > I also had a look at the automake source, and I rather find > this the problem (in lib/Automake/Variable.pm): > > elsif ($def->pretty == VAR_PRETTY) > [...] > my $wrap = makefile_wrap ("$str$name $equals", "

Re: whitespaces truncated [Automake 1.10b test release]

2009-04-28 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Monday 2009-04-27 22:27, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> CXXbar.o >> CXXLD prog >> $ grep CXX_0 Makefile.in >> am__v_CXX_0 = @echo " CXX " $@; > >Thanks for the bug report. Fixed with the patch below. I also had a look at the automake source, and I rather find this the problem (in lib/A

Re: whitespaces truncated [Automake 1.10b test release]

2009-04-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jan, * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:36:15PM CEST: > $ make > CC foo.o > CXX bar.o > CXXLD prog > $ grep CXX_0 Makefile.in > am__v_CXX_0 = @echo " CXX " $@; > > Expected result would have been: > > $ make > CC foo.o > CXXbar.o > CXXLD prog > $ grep CXX_

Re: Automake 1.10b test release

2009-04-26 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jan, * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:28:00PM CEST: > > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall silent-rules]) > > > >does not give me silent rules, but it does not throw a warning for an > >unknown option either. Automake is invoked via `autoreconf -fi`. > >What's up with it? > > Ok so

Re: Automake 1.10b test release

2009-04-25 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Ok so I was a bit too hasty here. Explicitly supplying V=0 to make 'solved' that. But I would like to have an option or some kind so that V=1 can be made default without having to pass --enable-silent-rules to configure.. (Conversely, a user can still ov

Re: whitespaces truncated [Automake 1.10b test release]

2009-04-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2009-03-31 01:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains >a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, >and probably a bunch of new bugs. Highlights, in no particular order: >[...]

Re: Automake 1.10b test release

2009-04-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Saturday 2009-04-25 23:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Tuesday 2009-03-31 01:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >>I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains >>a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, >>and

Re: Automake 1.10b test release

2009-04-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2009-03-31 01:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains >a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, >and probably a bunch of new bugs. Highlights, in no particular order: I just now t

Automake 1.10b test release

2009-03-30 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, and probably a bunch of new bugs. Highlights, in no particular order: Improved Fortran support, lzma/xz compressed tarballs, threaded automake exec