Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Any recipient of the package should have the ability to become a
> package "maintainer" without removing site/developer specific hacks.
I hadn't considered a "make dist" for copying around a locally "fixed"
version. Certainly, one cannot really maintain a package for whi
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
Hi Bruce!
"Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bruce> When you invoke, "make dist" I believe you are claiming
Bruce> that you wish to construct a new distribution for some
Bruce> distribution-related purpose. If you merely wish to
Hi Bruce!
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Bruce> When you invoke, "make dist" I believe you are claiming
Bruce> that you wish to construct a new distribution for some
Bruce> distribution-related purpose. If you merely wish to
Bruce> verify that the parts that you
"Deneys S. Maartens" wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce
>
> When compiling the autogen source without having libxml2 available, and
> then doing a `make dist' creates a broken distribution package which
> does not include the xml2ag/ subdirectory.
>
> A configure of the broken dist package fails with the follow
