there was a discussion on the list back in 2006/07 about adding an AM_LIBADD.
what came of that?
i ask because the DSO link change has broken many unit test makefiles that
relied on libtool generated libs to gather all the dependencies. I've resorted
to touching AM_LDFLAGS on each o
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi Ralk, I missed your answer :)
> Hehe, interesting typo. Ralph is a more common one. ;-)
How bizarre... I don't how I managed to get this one kucked up. The
feys are not even close!
>
es not spell like libfoo_la_LIBADD.
>
> And anyway, I guess LIBS applies to programs in addition to libraries,
> while LIBADD is meant for libraries only.
Sure. I think the addition of AM_LIBADD/tgt_LIBADD and
AM_LDADD/tgt_LDADD is a good idea.
Want to propose a patch? Or rather wait
>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Akim,
Hi Ralk, I missed your answer :)
> * Akim Demaille wrote on Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:56:16PM CET:
>>
>> For the records, I could use AM_LIBADD as a default value of
>>
Hello Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:56:16PM CET:
>
> For the records, I could use AM_LIBADD as a default value of
> libfoo_la_LIBADD. Currently it is not recognized.
LIBS is not enough? (If you care about allowing the user to set it,
you could add your
For the records, I could use AM_LIBADD as a default value of
libfoo_la_LIBADD. Currently it is not recognized.
