Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How hard is it going to be to move from the current object >> implementation to the one we really want? Akim> You want me to read in dead animals bodies :) Well, dead vegetables anyway. Akim> In short, reifying automake, I don't know. Reify

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-11 Thread akim
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:21:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:10:07PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > > How hard is it going to be to move from the current object > > implementation to the one we really want? > > In short, reifying automake, I don't know. Reifyi

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-11 Thread akim
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:10:07PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > > How hard is it going to be to move from the current object > implementation to the one we really want? You want me to read in dead animals bodies :) I currently have no idea... I'm sure macros and rules should be objects, afterwar

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-11 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim> I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that Akim> we are defining methods per _object_. Cleaner would mean one Akim> *class* per language, which seems overkill to me. Tom> Really? Why? To me it seems natural. Akim> Yes, you are right. But we still have to face the

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-11 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I have a mild dislike for this. If `finish' were a method then we >>> could simply inherit it. Akim> I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that Akim> we are defining

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have a mild dislike for this. >> If `finish' were a method then we could simply inherit it. Akim> I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that Akim> we are defining methods per _object_. Cleaner would mean one Akim> *cla

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-10 Thread akim
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:20:15PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have a mild dislike for this. > If `finish' were a method then we could simply inherit it. I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that we are definin

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch

2001-04-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> * automake.in: (Language): Add attribute `_finish'. Akim> (&finish): New. Akim> (Automake): Adjust. Akim> (&lang_header_finish, &lang_yaccxx_finish, &lang_lexxx_finish) Akim> (&lang_asm_finish): Remove. I'm not so sure abo

82-lang-finish.patch

2001-03-23 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in: (Language): Add attribute `_finish'. (&finish): New. (Automake): Adjust. (&lang_header_finish, &lang_yaccxx_finish, &lang_lexxx_finish) (&lang_asm_finish): Remove. Ind