Re: 50-many-my.patch

2001-02-23 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akim> * automake.in: Promote local `my' over `local'. > > Ok. > > Thanks for doing this. I'm sure it is a pain. Well, I've seen more exciting tasks :) But since I quickly pollute my actual patches with such changes, I should first get rid of what temp

50-many-my.patch

2001-02-22 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in: Promote local `my' over `local'. Index: automake.in --- automake.in Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:28:50 +0100 akim (am/f/39_automake.i 1.58 755) +++ automake.in Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:51:21 +0100 akim (am/f/39_au

Re: 50-many-my.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Akim! On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Akim Demaille wrote: > Index: ChangeLog > from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * automake.in: Promote local `my' over `local'. I fully agree with this approch. I believe you should be allowed to checking such patched without approval. But please b

Re: 50-many-my.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim> * automake.in: Promote local `my' over `local'. Ok. Thanks for doing this. I'm sure it is a pain. Tom

Re: 50-many-my.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> Also it would be nice if you checked on some projects that the Pavel> makefiles don't change. I see you are doing it with Pavel> Autoconf. Consider a bigger project for the test (Lesstif Pavel> should be fine). Sometimes I test aga

50-many-my.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in: Promote local `my' over `local'. Index: automake.in --- automake.in Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:28:50 +0100 akim (am/f/39_automake.i 1.58 755) +++ automake.in Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:51:21 +0100 akim (am/f/39_au