Re: 43-conditionals-as-hashes.patch

2001-02-21 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akim> Ideally I'd say we need objects for variables, and have a > Akim> uniformized handling of conditionalized/unconditinal variables. > > This patch needed a lot less defense than you posted -- the only > reason conditionals were implemented in that ugl

Re: 43-conditionals-as-hashes.patch

2001-02-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> Ideally I'd say we need objects for variables, and have a Akim> uniformized handling of conditionalized/unconditinal variables. This patch needed a lot less defense than you posted -- the only reason conditionals were implemented in

43-conditionals-as-hashes.patch

2001-02-18 Thread Akim Demaille
Yes, in there, there are snippets which are not related to the core of the patch, but I made them because they helped me dealing with this rather complex patch. The previous scheme was making things uselessly complex: a conditionalized variable had a value such as: @COND_TRUE@ foo.c @CON