Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW it is hard to read big rearrangement patches.
Agreed.
> It is made worse because sometimes they include actual code changes
> as well. For instance this patch wasn't just a rearrangement, it
> included semantic differences in file_contents.
That'
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:02:50PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> BTW it is hard to read big rearrangement patches. It is made worse
rearrangements are done better by a script than a patch.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> * dist.am: Remove, merge into...
Akim> * distdir.am: here. Use the neat sed snippet for banners.
Akim> BTW, distcheck is phony.
Akim> * automake.in (&handle_dist_worker): Remove, merge into...
Akim> (&handle_dist): this.
A
This patch seems wrong: it merges where splitting would be more
welcome. But the difference between handle_dist and
handle_dist_worker was fairly artificial and became annoying in the
process of cleaning the dist targets.
I also merged dist.am into distdir.am because (i) I was extremely
annoyed
