Re: 30-transform-cond.patch

2001-02-08 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> Here is the version I'm applying. The changes Tom noted were Akim> due to my writing $pair instead of $pairs. I hope some day we Akim> really use strict... And prototypes, which will require a lot Akim> of massage, since it means

Re: 30-transform-cond.patch

2001-02-08 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do like the patch. But I'd like these things to be fixed before you > check it in. Here is what I checked in. Thanks for noticing! -- Here is the version I'm applying. The changes

Re: 30-transform-cond.patch

2001-02-08 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akim> This patch includes the Makefile.ins' diffs, i.e., no changes. > > Umm, there are plenty of Makefile.in changes here. Right, and a lot of thanks for reviewing them into the details! > Some are whitespace changes, which I'd prefer not to change: >

Re: 30-transform-cond.patch

2001-02-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> A very stupid and mechanic patch, indeed, but it helps me seeing what Akim> happens. In this patch I took the freedom of introducing a new Akim> syntax: @FOO@ means `to be substituted', while `?FOO?' means to be Akim> removed if pos

30-transform-cond.patch

2001-02-06 Thread Akim Demaille
A very stupid and mechanic patch, indeed, but it helps me seeing what happens. In this patch I took the freedom of introducing a new syntax: @FOO@ means `to be substituted', while `?FOO?' means to be removed if positive, or to kill the line if negative, and conversely for `?!FOO?'. This patch in