Re: 20-distdir-am.patch

2001-02-04 Thread Akim Demaille
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, Akim! > > Another problem. Test pr87.test fails. It fails in a makefile that > contains the following fragment: > > distdir = $(top_builddir)/$(PACKAGE)-$(VERSION)/$(subdir) > > @for file in $(DISTFILES); do \ > > distdir: $(DISTFILES)

Re: 20-distdir-am.patch

2001-02-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> @if HAS_SUBDIRS@ Akim> ... Akim> @fi HAS_SUBDIRS@ Something like this would be fine. I'd prefer `endif' instead of `fi'. Maybe in this case the `@'s are redundant. Supporting `else' might also be good. Akim> * distdir.am (dist

20-distdir-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread Akim Demaille
Actually, it seems to me there is not enough paragraph rules at all in automake. Instead of the attrocious @SUBDIRS@ for subdir in $(@DIST_SUBDIR_NAME@); do \ @SUBDIRS@ if test "$$subdir" = .; then :; else \ @SUBDIRS@ test -d $(distdir)/$$subdir \ @SUBDIRS@ || m