Re: 104-handle-languages-morphing-5.patch

2001-05-07 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> compile_f_c_cxx.test:foo_SOURCES = foo.f bar.c baz.cc Tom> This one doesn't really test the problem I'm thinking of. In Tom> this case the files are all from different languages. Pff, sorry for being blind. I really thought there was

Re: 104-handle-languages-morphing-5.patch

2001-05-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> The test that check this (which I now ) are Akim> compile_f_c_cxx.test:foo_SOURCES = foo.f bar.c baz.cc This one doesn't really test the problem I'm thinking of. In this case the files are all from different languages. Akim> subo

Re: 104-handle-languages-morphing-5.patch

2001-05-07 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> It has been hard for me to figure out what the patches preceding Tom> this one did. I understand. Tom> I'm guessing that we still include depend2 multiple times, but Tom> that the loop is not visible in this patch? In fact, this is wha

Re: 104-handle-languages-morphing-5.patch

2001-05-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> * automake.in (&handle_languages): Compute `$ltoutarg' and Akim> `$outarg' independently from dependency code. Akim> There is no use looping on a language's possible extensions since Akim> we loop over used extensions. Akim>

104-handle-languages-morphing-5.patch

2001-04-01 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog >From Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in (&handle_languages): Compute `$ltoutarg' and `$outarg' independently from dependency code. There is no use looping on a language's possible extensions since we loop over used extensions.