Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == akim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> I kept comparing Makefile.in from previous automake with my patched Akim> versions, and didn't notice this problem. I just noticed this reading subdirs.am. I didn't look to see if automake.in still generates the .PHONY entries. Tom

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread akim
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:27:05AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Akim> My `plan' is what I implemented in the patch named > Akim> factored-dependencies. > > Thanks. I missed some patches in my inbox last night. > > BTW subdirs.am doesn

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> My `plan' is what I implemented in the patch named Akim> factored-dependencies. Thanks. I missed some patches in my inbox last night. BTW subdirs.am doesn't have .PHONY entries for the *clean-recursive rules. Is this intentional?

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> Do you mean something like doing this for install, uninstall Tom> targets, and the like? Right. Tom> That would be fine with me. However for non-trivial targets Tom> sometimes weird special handling is required. Most probably. But in

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-31 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> It means that for instance we could have Akim> a b c: d e f Akim> in a .am file, and have file_contents_with_transform (provided Akim> we taught it that a, b and c are special t

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> It means that for instance we could have Akim> a b c: d e f Akim> in a .am file, and have file_contents_with_transform (provided we Akim> taught it that a, b and c are special targets) push @a, @b, @c the Akim> list of d, e and f.

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-30 Thread Derek R. Price
Akim Demaille wrote: > | It is fine to `cvs add' a file so that `cvs diff -N' creates the > | correct diff. This applies generally -- if you don't have cvs write > | access there is a script you can get that will do a phony `cvs add' by > | manipulating CVS/Entries. > > Oh, I didn't know that, t

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-29 Thread Akim Demaille
| > "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Akim> * automake.in (handle_phony): Sort. | Akim> * automake.in (file_contents_with_transform): Catch `.PHONY:'. | Akim> * check.am: New file. | | check.am wasn't in the patch. However, I trust it is just a

Re: 10-check-am.patch

2001-01-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> * automake.in (handle_phony): Sort. Akim> * automake.in (file_contents_with_transform): Catch `.PHONY:'. Akim> * check.am: New file. check.am wasn't in the patch. However, I trust it is just an extraction from handle_tests.

10-check-am.patch

2001-01-28 Thread Akim Demaille
Index: ChangeLog from Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in (handle_phony): Sort. * automake.in (file_contents_with_transform): Catch `.PHONY:'. * check.am: New file. Index: tests/Makefile.in --- tests/Makefile.in Sat, 13 Jan 2001 18:11:09 +0100 akim (am/f/3_Ma