Re: 03-remove-clean-am-files.patch

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't want to unify the .am readers for 1.5. My experience is that > automake users have all kinds of ugly stuff in their Makefile.am. We > definitely don't want to support this stuff long-term, but I think > changing it now would be ill-advised. I ag

Re: 03-remove-clean-am-files.patch

2001-03-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim> I do agree introducing ?INSTALL? obfuscates, but I still have Akim> if/fi in mind. The reason I didn't implement if/fi support is Akim> that I want to use the same as for Makefile.am, but improving it Akim> with support for TRUE and FALSE directly, in which case there is Akim> no @FOO_TRUE@

03-remove-clean-am-files.patch

2001-03-04 Thread Akim Demaille
I do agree introducing ?INSTALL? obfuscates, but I still have if/fi in mind. The reason I didn't implement if/fi support is that I want to use the same as for Makefile.am, but improving it with support for TRUE and FALSE directly, in which case there is no @FOO_TRUE@ etc. to output, just statical