thanks! [Re: 01-factor-all.patch

2001-03-12 Thread Jim Meyering
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... | > Akim> I meant, `Makefile' must be done before `all', but not | > Akim> `$(DATA)', which is now a dependency of all-am, not `all'. | > Akim> There was no such distinction before, but for `config.h' (one | > Akim> way to paraphrase the paragraph above

Re: 01-factor-all.patch

2001-03-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also, `all' isn't the only time that Makefiles can be rebuilt. Akim> I very much agree, and was puzzled by this. I guessed we meant Akim> to provide some support for the most common case. Could be. Maybe the ChangeLog provides a clu

Re: 01-factor-all.patch

2001-03-05 Thread Akim Demaille
Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think it is actually important to support non-GNU make > implementations here. We've never supported Makefile rebuilding with > vendor makes in the past. No other GNU Makefile has. We've also > never had a complaint about it. Since it sounds li

Re: 01-factor-all.patch

2001-03-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Akim> There is one big twofold change introduced by this change. Akim> First all-redirect no longer exists. In fact I don't even Akim> understand why it existed I don't remember. It might have been to avoid putting config.h machinery into &do_one_merge_target. Or it might have been an obscure

01-factor-all.patch

2001-03-04 Thread Akim Demaille
This one was tricky as @all was used all over the place. Hence the size, sorry :( There is one big twofold change introduced by this change. First all-redirect no longer exists. In fact I don't even understand why it existed, all you had was am: all-redirect and all-redirect had all the magi