Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-09 Thread Michael Bletzinger
"Lars J. Aas" wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:48:38AM -0600, Michael Bletzinger wrote: > : The thing is, that since every AC_SUBST'd variable is transformed into a > : make variable, you can already specify all sorts of derived stuff using > : make variables in Makefile.am's with the CVS au

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-09 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 10:48:38AM -0600, Michael Bletzinger wrote: : The thing is, that since every AC_SUBST'd variable is transformed into a : make variable, you can already specify all sorts of derived stuff using : make variables in Makefile.am's with the CVS automake. For example: : : in the

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-09 Thread Michael Bletzinger
Tom Tromey wrote: > > > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> I believe everything should be in order (I believe I filled out > Lars> for Automake and maybe even Libtool when I did it for Autoconf). > > Yeah, I found the info. > > Lars> Anyways, the patch should be rew

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-08 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I believe everything should be in order (I believe I filled out Lars> for Automake and maybe even Libtool when I did it for Autoconf). Yeah, I found the info. Lars> Anyways, the patch should be reworked to use a &canonicalize() Lars>

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-08 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 12:05:28AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: : > "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Lars> Anyways, are the people that count looking into this patch? I'd : Lars> prefer it if it was applied or rejected as soon as possible : Lars> instead of waiting in the dark..

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Anyways, are the people that count looking into this patch? I'd Lars> prefer it if it was applied or rejected as soon as possible Lars> instead of waiting in the dark... What, and break the long automake tradition of getting email abo

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-02-05 Thread Akim Demaille
"Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyways, are the people that count looking into this patch? I will, when I have time :( Sorry for the delays...

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-01-31 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:02:06PM +0100, Lars J. Aas wrote: : I've revised the patch to include the latest changes from CVS Autoconf, : which made the complate patch somewhat simpler than before. I even corrected complete My fingers are slippy today. Anyways, are the people th

Re: [revised patch 1/1] support AC_SUBST'able automake rules

2001-01-31 Thread Lars J. Aas
I've revised the patch to include the latest changes from CVS Autoconf, which made the complate patch somewhat simpler than before. I even corrected the changelog date :) 2001-01-31 Lars J. Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * automake.in ($CANONICALS): New variable containing the character