On Fri, 1 May 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Here's a reason against moving the CC and the object file farther
apart: with several languages, lots of sources,
CC foo.o
FC bar.o
CC baz.o
it is less easy to see at a glance which compiler corresponds to
which object file, the furth
Hello Jan,
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Fri, May 01, 2009 at 06:46:42PM CEST:
> On Friday 2009-05-01 09:57, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:05:07PM CEST:
> >> Output seems crushed, so restore the original behavior.
> >
> >Can you explain this, please?
>
>
On Friday 2009-05-01 09:57, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>Hi Jan,
>
>* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:05:07PM CEST:
>> Output seems crushed, so restore the original behavior.
>
>Can you explain this, please?
The original submission I did around October 2008 followed the
Linux-style ou
Hi Jan,
* Jan Engelhardt wrote on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:05:07PM CEST:
> Output seems crushed, so restore the original behavior.
Can you explain this, please?
Also, can you please use automake-patches for patches?
Thanks,
Ralf
> --- automake.orig/automake.in
> +++ automake/automake.in
> @@ -11
Output seems crushed, so restore the original behavior.
---
automake.in |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: automake/automake.in
===
--- automake.orig/automake.in
+++ automake/automake.in
@@ -1199,7 +11
