Re: [patch] noinst_JAVA

2000-12-23 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Rusty" == Rusty Ballinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rusty> Hey, a thing that's bothered me for a while is that noinst_JAVA Rusty> is broken. Thanks, I checked in your patch. Rusty> (The reason for this test is that the install rule in java.am Rusty> installs *.class; in Todd's case, fo

[patch] noinst_JAVA

2000-11-11 Thread Rusty Ballinger
Hey, a thing that's bothered me for a while is that noinst_JAVA is broken. If you use noinst_JAVA, your .java files are still assigned to noinst_JAVA, and clean-noinstJAVA removes classnoinst.stamp, but DIST_COMMON gets $(_JAVA) instead of $(noinst_JAVA), all-am depends on class.stamp instead of