> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> True. It won't be compatible with a traditional BSD install
Roger> though, AFAIK.
Too bad :P
Tom> Yeah. This is a problem because install-sh is slow. I
Tom> occasionally hear complaints about this.
Well, we could spare it the mult
> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> I sent a link to my patch a week ago, but I didn't see any
Roger> reply. Is there anything wrong with this patch?
Tom> This is actually a tricky area. For instance, how is the
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Akim> IMHO, this is obfuscating the code. The real means (again,
Akim> IMHO) to address this issue should be to use an install-sh which
Akim> creates the directories and their parents when needed.
[ ... ]
Roger> True. It won't be compat
> "Roger" == Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roger> I sent a link to my patch a week ago, but I didn't see any
Roger> reply. Is there anything wrong with this patch?
This is actually a tricky area.
For instance, how is the `installdirs' target going to work?
This target is sort of b
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:34:56PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> IMHO, this is obfuscating the code. The real means (again, IMHO) to
> address this issue should be to use an install-sh which creates the
> directories and their parents when needed.
That would be ideal.
> It simplifies the cod
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
D
Akim> IMHO, this is obfuscating the code. The real means (again, IMHO) to
Akim> address this issue should be to use an install-sh which creates the
Akim> directories and their parents when needed.
Akim> It simplifies the code, address
IMHO, this is obfuscating the code. The real means (again, IMHO) to
address this issue should be to use an install-sh which creates the
directories and their parents when needed.
It simplifies the code, addresses your issue, and also guarantees that
in the future, all such targets will behave a
I sent a link to my patch a week ago, but I didn't see any reply. Is
there anything wrong with this patch?
Regards,
Roger
diff -urN automake/lib/am/data.am automake-new/lib/am/data.am
--- automake/lib/am/data.am Fri Nov 9 16:25:03 2001
+++ automake-new/lib/am/data.am Fri Mar 1 23:26:36 20
