> "Hari" == Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hari> One approach would be to use $(INSTALL_HEADER) which defaults to
Hari> $(INSTALL_DATA), and allow users to specify a special installer
Hari> if they choose. Of course, it would be nice if 'install' in
Hari> fileutils could be exte
On Oct 17, 2000, Raja R Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, it would be nice if 'install' in fileutils
> could be extended to provide a --only-if-change option.
Well, there's always move-if-change... But yes, that seems to be the
way to go. We shouldn't change what isn't broken; g
Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
> > or Jim could confirm it's OK.
>
> I have mixed feelings about this. At first, it may sound nice to not
> touch pr
On Oct 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
> or Jim could confirm it's OK.
I have mixed feelings about this. At first, it may sound nice to not
touch pre-existing files. However, think of someone that uses
This patch seems OK to me, but I'd appreciate if Alexandre, Tom, Pavel
or Jim could confirm it's OK.
Hi,
it'd be nice if something like the attached patch could go into
Automake. It'd save a lot of recompiling for developers writing
libraries.
2000-10-02 Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* header.am (install-@DIR@HEADERS): Don't install a header file if
it is identical to th
