Re: "set -e" in subshell is now reliable

2001-02-23 Thread Akim Demaille
Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, Akim! > > You recently applied a patch to tests/target-cflags.test without > mentioning it in ChangeLog. Maybe you didn't mean to commit that change? > > If you did, then two small fixes are needed: > > 1) You should run ./foo instead /foo > 2)

Re: "set -e" in subshell is now reliable

2001-02-22 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Pavel> You recently applied a patch to tests/target-cflags.test Pavel> without mentioning it in ChangeLog. Maybe you didn't mean to Pavel> commit that change? Oops. Pavel> * tests/target-cflags.test: Don't use subshell to configure in P

"set -e" in subshell is now reliable

2001-02-21 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Akim! You recently applied a patch to tests/target-cflags.test without mentioning it in ChangeLog. Maybe you didn't mean to commit that change? If you did, then two small fixes are needed: 1) You should run ./foo instead /foo 2) bash could not detect it because "set -e" doesn't propagate