* Yevgen Muntyan wrote on Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:13:55PM CET:
>
> Well, I didn't mention it, but non-recursive make is one of things
> I am trying to do here. Its speed indeed is just awesome, but it also
> leads to huge mess: things like
> foo_SOURCES += subdir/subdir/subdir/foo.c subdir/subdir/s
Hello Yevgen,
* Yevgen Muntyan wrote on Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:32:11PM CET:
>
> I am trying to figure out how to avoid using libtool when I don't need a
> shared library. [...]
> subdir1/
> libsubdir1.la
> subsubdir1/
> libsubsubdir1.la
> subsubdir2/
> libsubsubdir2.la
Try using
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Yevgen Muntyan wrote on Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:13:55PM CET:
Well, I didn't mention it, but non-recursive make is one of things
I am trying to do here. Its speed indeed is just awesome, but it also
leads to huge mess: things like
foo_SOURCES += subdir/subdir/subdir/f
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello Yevgen,
* Yevgen Muntyan wrote on Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:32:11PM CET:
I am trying to figure out how to avoid using libtool when I don't need a
shared library. [...]
subdir1/
libsubdir1.la
subsubdir1/
libsubsubdir1.la
subsubdir2/
libsubsubdir
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how to avoid using libtool when I don't need a
shared library. The current, "normal", setup is like this: I have a toplevel
library which gets built into the executable, it gets built from libs from
subdirs, and those subdirs in turn have subdirs with convenience
l
