On Tuesday 13 February 2007 13:37:26 Enrico wrote:
> Christian Parpart ha scritto:
> > there's also a third way: ${datadir} which I can't understand the
> > difference of - is there?
> >
> > christian.
>
> Hi Christian!
>
> ${datadir} is a normal variable of bash and is a more complete form of
> $d
Christian Parpart ha scritto:
there's also a third way: ${datadir} which I can't understand the
difference of - is there?
christian.
Hi Christian!
${datadir} is a normal variable of bash and is a more complete form of
$datadir.
you can find more info here:
http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/h
* Christian Parpart wrote on Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:45:04PM CET:
> On Thursday 08 February 2007 20:47:53 Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> > If you use $(datadir), the user can override it at build time (e.g.
> > make datadir=''). Not so with @datadir@ where the @datadir@
> > string is replaced in-place.
>
On Thursday 08 February 2007 20:47:53 Albert Chin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Enrico Sardi wrote:
> > I've read autoconf and automake manuals but I've not yet fully
> > understand a thing...what's the difference between writing $(datadir)
>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:13:18PM +0100, Enrico Sardi wrote:
> I've read autoconf and automake manuals but I've not yet fully
> understand a thing...what's the difference between writing $(datadir)
> and @datadir@ in a makefile.am?
If you use $(datadir), the user can o
Hi all,
I've read autoconf and automake manuals but I've not yet fully
understand a thing...what's the difference between writing $(datadir)
and @datadir@ in a makefile.am?
Many thanks
Enrico
