On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Eric Dorland wrote:
> I'll probably spend my time instead trying to remove automake 1.4 from
> Debian at this point since it's super old.
Yes please! I think at this point "super old" is quite an understatement :)
--
Benoit "t
Removal of $(mkdir_p) is only planned for Automake 1.13, that is
> still unreleased.
I don't know how exactly yet, but I got a report from a 1.12.1 user
where the Makefile generated by Automake didn't have a definition for
`mkdir_p'.
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
ld ignore people using obsolete
software, but there's just too many of them, especially thanks to
RedHat / CentOS.
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:00 AM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:04 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> What would be nice would be to have the ability to recompile only the
>> .java that changed. So when you edit 2/3 files, then we'd build just
>> that, but in one co
n how to turn all the .class into a .jar?
>> > It seems that when I try this, Automake dies with "Java source seen
>> > but `GCJ' is undefined".
>> >
>> Yes, because Automake thinks you want to build foo.jar as a binary
>> executable, and so it wants to use gcj to compile it. This happens
>> because you've listed foo.jar in a PROGRAMS primary, which is only
>> meant for binary executables, not scripts or bytecode files (ok, I'm
>> simplifying things a bit here, but the main point stands).
>
> Well, that could be fixed, no? Question is what about @substed_programs@.
I didn't get this either.
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
better way?
Thanks.
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:55 AM, tsuna wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Stefano Lattarini
>> wrote:
>>> As my java foo is pretty weak, I'm not sure how to handle jar manifests,
>>> jar entry poi
.
I just sent a trivial patch to automake-patches (Message-Id:
<1310773785-4708-1-git-send-email-tsuna...@gmail.com>) to add
cross-references between the two sections. I was rather confused when
I realized there were 2 different sections about Java in the manual.
Eventually these 2 sections sho
g? Like isn't it possible to have a bin_PROGRAMS = foo.jar and
foo_jar_SOURCES = main.java and then tell automake how to transform a
.java into a .class and then how to turn all the .class into a .jar?
It seems that when I try this, Automake dies with "Java source seen
but `GCJ' is undefined".
Thanks and sorry for the longish email.
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
On Sat, May 5, 2007 22:56, Stephane Bortzmeyer said:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:13:25PM +0200,
> Tsuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 42 lines which said:
>
>> Looks like aclocal does not know where libtool.m4 is.
>
> Thanks for the very good tip. Th
nd
libtool's macros because they're somewhere they're not looking.
Some packaging systems install newer versions of libtool under the name
glibtool / glibtoolize (eg: MacPorts on Mac OS X). If it's your case,
simply export LIBTOOL=glibtool; export LIBTOOLIZE=glibtoolize and then
autoreconf -fvi.
--
SIGOURE Benoit aka Tsuna
EPITA Promo 2008, LRDE
check/make
install process. You can find these tarballs on the sites of each
package, namely:
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/#downloading
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/#downloading
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
Cheers,
--
SIGOURE Benoit aka Tsuna
EPITA Promo 2008, LRDE
12 matches
Mail list logo
