Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:52:39AM +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> OK. If you say that a more fuzzy proposal shouldn't cause problems at
> this point, I'll follow your lead.
In our experience, fuzzy proposals do not work well. Very few students
are up to making design decisions -- and cons
Hi,
> Olaf> (I fail to see any advantage in the new system
>
> That's too bad. You must not have run into the various bugs with the
> old approach.
What kind of bugs? And why is the new approach better in this regard?
> Olaf> while the clobbering of the make output is a considerable Olaf>
> p
Hi,
Is there some way to use the old dependency system with recent versions
of Automake? (I fail to see any advantage in the new system, while the
clobbering of the make output is a considerable problem -- it's hardly
possible to see what is beeing done or to find compiler messages among
all the
