On 2014-11-12
fr33domlover wrote:
>
> Here's part of my code:
>
> all-local: ref
>
> ref: ref-html
> ref-html: ref-full-html ref-api-html
> ref-full: ref-full-html
> ref-api: ref-api-html
> ref-full-html: $(reference_full_devhelp_chosen) \
>
On 2014-11-12
Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2014-11-12 21:58 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> > On 2014-11-12
> > Nick Bowler wrote:
> > > What is probably happening is that in VPATH builds from your tarball,
> > > your documentation is being rebuilt even though it was d
On 2014-11-12
Nick Bowler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> > On 2014-11-11
> > Simon Richter wrote:
> > > On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed becaus
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 22:02, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain,
> >> because it should expect the files to be there.
>
> > The files are not specified in any
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 21:07, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> >> When the files are distributed, the "distcheck" should recognize that
> >> these belong in the source package, and not show an error.
>
> > Hmmm I
On 2014-11-11
Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote:
>
> > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get
> > cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my
> > package this
On 2014-10-27
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 11:11 AM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2014-10-26 22:15 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> >> I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use
> >> makefile variables, so just to be sure -
> >&
ng any bad practices in my autotools setup :-)
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 63E5E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I'm a bit confused about all the expressive features and ways to use makefile
variables, so just to be sure -
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Substitution-Refs.html
Are these uses of variables portable, or should a portable Makefile.am use only
the plain $(var) form wit
On 2014-10-20
Nick Bowler wrote:
>
> Not exactly. Distcheck first creates a distribution tarball (i.e.,
> make dist), THEN it unpacks the tarball into a temporary srcdir and
> tests that. In other words, distcheck is directly testing the 'user
> experience' when they unpack a tarball you publi
ing satisfied by it
(since the script file exists), it complains there's no target for it (but none
needed since it's a file and it already exists).
Is there a solution for this in automake?
If not, I'll take a look at the implementation of distcheck and see if anything
can be
uld I do? I do want my `make distcheck` to succeed, and this issue
seems to be the only thing preventing that.
Thanks!
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 937A67EF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2014-08-12
fr33domlover wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm writing a Makefile.am with a custom piece for building, distributing and
> installing Doxygen-generated documentation. All the generated files are used
> as values for the special-scheme variables, e.g. 'dist_r
On 2014-08-12
Nick Bowler wrote:
>
> Yes, but I think you have clean/distclean backwards. There are four
> clean targets:
>
> mostlyclean
> clean
> distclean
> maintainer-clean
>
> Each target in the list performs all the actions of the targets
> above it in addition to its own actions
Hello automakers!
I'm using autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.11.6 (Debian 7 stable). Recently I tried
defining the source code folder name using a variable and strange things happen.
I'm not sure whether this is a bug or my mistake. Here's the revelant part
from Makefile.am, before the change, which *
Hello,
I'm writing a Makefile.am with a custom piece for building, distributing and
installing Doxygen-generated documentation. All the generated files are used as
values for the special-scheme variables, e.g. 'dist_reference_DATA =
index.html'.
Installation targets are automatically generated,
ummy Makefile.am and see what happens in the final
Makefile, but I still do prefer to know whether such inclusion of *CLEANFILES
is formal and can be expected from Automake.
Thanks in advance,
fr33domlover
PGP key ID: 937A67EF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
17 matches
Mail list logo
