Re: bug#11089: LINK determination

2012-03-28 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
L) --tag=CXX $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) \ --mode=link $(CXXLD) $(foo_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) \ $(foo_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ and a more elaborate workaround is needed. What is the best way to handle this situation? An additional test case? Regards Peter Breitenlohner

Re: How to tell Automake about dependencies between source files.

2009-03-18 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
g a compilation rule as Automake would do). === The above example may look somewhat artificial. However, it is a stripped down version of what we really need. Regards Peter Breitenlohner

How to tell Automake about dependencies between source files.

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
Automake, avoiding unnecessary tasks, not interfering with Automake's automatic dependency tracking, and not having 'make dist' gratuitously build files that are never used. Best regards Peter Breitenlohner

automake-gnats: #533 and #535

2009-02-02 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
@@ +2009-02-02 Peter Breitenlohner + + Extract correct man section from files in MAN_MANS. + * lib/am/mans.am: Extract correct man section. + * tests/Makefile.am, tests/man5.test: New test case. + 2008-11-23 Ralf Wildenhues * configure.ac, NEWS: Bump version to 1.10

Implementing notrans_man_MANS (Was: Automake bug #516 -- and more)

2008-02-19 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hello Ralf, * Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:28:28AM CET: [...] (1) In some cases it is completely inadequate to apply the program name transform to manpage names. [...] Maybe that could be taken care of by something like

Re: Automake bug #516 -- and more

2008-01-23 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
ges is very desirable. --- What is your opinion? Regards, Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: GNU Automake 1.10.1 released -- bug #516 is still there

2008-01-22 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
from the source tree in preference to those from the build tree together with a tiny and IMHO uncontroversial patch solving this problem. I am terribly disappointed that I never got any reaction and that this bug is still present in the new release. regards Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: GNU Automake 1.9.3 released

2004-11-02 Thread Peter Breitenlohner
or 1.9.2. Tho output is attached. BTW: The installed version of automake is 1.8.4 regards Peter Breitenlohner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>make -Ctests VERBOSE=1 TESTS='makej.test missing.test missing2.test' check make: Entering directory `/.th/thsrc/archive/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.3-bu